Mete Türkdönmez commented on Texas Hold'em Poker
What is done with 36 credits facebook?! :D
Reply · 2011-07-22 02:48:22
Latest Comments on Socidi
- Mete Türkdönmez commented on blobalProfessional blog writer and blog of digital media.Reply · 2011-07-22 02:47:23
- Ümit Kuzan commented on WebrazziAbout social media.Reply · 2011-06-15 17:57:45
- Gökhan Çeliker replied on The suborbital space tourism is TOO DANGEROUSI agree. We all have limited time. That's why we should focus on what we do best (in your case writing articles) and pay others for work that we would probably do better but don't have the time to do so.Reply · 2011-06-07 17:18:38
- Gaetano Marano replied on The suborbital space tourism is TOO DANGEROUSthanks for the suggestion, I already know 99designs, but I'm able to design a better blog layout, however, so far I've decided to use my time to write articles (and, unfortunately, the articles I want to write was been, and still are, ten times the articles I've time to write)Reply · 2011-06-07 11:59:07
- Gökhan Çeliker replied on The suborbital space tourism is TOO DANGEROUSIt looks like you have great articles, but can I make a suggestion? You need a designer's touch. Take a look at www.99designs.comReply · 2011-06-07 11:45:56
- Gaetano Marano replied on The suborbital space tourism is TOO DANGEROUSit's only one of many topics about space I talk about on my www.ghostNASA.com blogReply · 2011-06-07 11:33:34
- Gökhan Çeliker replied on The suborbital space tourism is TOO DANGEROUSI couldn't help myself thinking, why this particular topic interests you so much?Reply · 2011-06-07 11:31:27
- Gaetano Marano replied on The suborbital space tourism is TOO DANGEROUSnon problem, if some (rich) space tourists will die, they may always say that it was an "human mistake" of the pilots ... :|Reply · 2011-06-07 11:04:17
- Gökhan Çeliker replied on The suborbital space tourism is TOO DANGEROUSYeah, that's right. I think they are hoping that space touring would be be awesome. It would be catastrophic if the mission fails.Reply · 2011-06-07 10:51:21